As of Jan 14, what I hoped will be a new workspace.
I assumed that the experience with the iPhone would make the setup on the iPad easy. It helped not at all. I still bought easily five or six apps for each one I settled on. I am happy with Apple overall, but the app evaluation process is severely broken.
A main purpose of the machine is to allow me to gather and review material, usually already collected, and generate new essays to further the work here. The gathering part is annoyingly distributed among several platforms and apps.
Documents from Readdle, for the PDFs of my manually scanned but not recently read technical papers. I have other file utilities, but I just like the way this one works. My needs are simple, but I am particular about details and polish.
Instapaper — as on the iPhone — for online findings, usually from Science magazine. I know other services have since come along, but the quiet competence of this pleases me. I pay extra. This has recently been sold and the business model may drift away from me.
BookEnds — also on the phone — for the existing reference library and PDFs. The desktop application is superior to competitors for my needs and I would have gone with the developer just on that score. But this mobile app is just kickass. I have essentially my entire reference library on the device in fully indexed form.
GoodReader to send PDFs to, to be read. PDFPen to annotate them, sometimes linked to iCloud versions on the desktop. These are both best in class.
My text editor is Textilus. Gosh this was a tough effort settling on this. The advertised attraction for many of the others was markdown support, which I just don’t use. My iPad documents go as pure text to: Attribute and Preference defaults updated for Tinderbox v9.6.0 (via a non-automated route at present), and RTF to Evernote (which is growing on me — more than Dropbox).
Again... all about trust and privacy.
... Poster for the Kutachi annotations and newly to Scrivener. (This is for the Essene/Matthew example. There is a Scrivener for iPad in development.) Textilus handles all these well, and iCloud and Dropbox too. It has a powerful extra keyboard row and all the ordinary features I need, including appearance options. I supplement it with TextExpander and Unicode Maps. I like the style of Daedalus and maybe a future connection with Ulysses III will prompt a re-examination. I spent weeks trying to like Nebulous because of the unique powerful macros, but small bugs, quirks and ugly got in the way.
Big lists are handled by OmniOutliner, linked to the desktop version by an annoying kludge that is promised to be improved in the next version. I bought them all, all the other outliners and this is still the gold standard. I read small lists on iOS with TaskPaper but find it difficult to edit them other than on the desktop.
I cannot comment on the periodical apps: Zinio, iBooks, Newsstand and so on as I am just setting them up with the several dozen journals I get. This is much harder than it should be. I can say that although I have a great relationship with Amazon, I’ve bought my few books so far from Apple because IBooks is a better experience than Kindle on the iPad. I haven’t yet found an acceptable iOS RSS reader.
Moviewatching on the device is expected to be big, but I just haven’t set it up yet. That and the PDFs are what drives the need for the large storage. I store no photos on the device.
I am a heavy user of Keynote and OmniGraffle on the MacBookPro, so have the iOS versions, but I have to say I find them too clunky to use for any heavy work.
A big surprise is FileMaker. Their iOS client is powerful and free. I am finding it a lovely experience adapting and expanding a layout of the FilmsFolded database for the iPad. The desktop version (for me it is FMP 12 Advanced) is frustrating in its peculiarities and quirks, but wow you can do some rather heavy application development for the iPad with this little guy.
Of all the things on the device, the most technically impressive and gee wiz cool is Star Walk. It can give you an annotated star map that is accurate as you move it over your head. Makes me smile.
My big chore at present is drawing app evaluation. The problem here is that I know I will need freehand drawings for the Kutachi project, but not precisely what. I know that I want to use a calligraphy brush with my pressure sensitive stylus (Pogo Connect), on a white or similar background. Textured paper may be nice. I want to vary the colors and have them interact. I’d like some gradient in the color. I’d like for it to be the beginning of a workflow.
So far as stroke editors, here are what still survive on the machine:
Noteshelf. It is nice enough. Has support for the stylus and integrates well with Evernote. It is the default choice at present, and I expect to work with it.
Paper by 53. Also supports the stylus and is elegant though feature constrained. It has nice watercolors but you cannot (even with the substantial inapp purchases) change the size of the brush! Thay say ‘this is not in development.’ The gestures really are elegant, on par with Daedalus.
Procreate. This also supports the stylus and is a real painting app, though I would only use it for brushlines on white. The file management is primitive.
Auryn Ink. This is a watercolor application that I would adapt. It has the advantage of stroke colors mixing with others under variable wetness. I am impressed and think I could do some cool things here. No support for my stylus.
Zen Brush. No control over the brush thickness. No color. But tantalizingly smooth integration with the stylus. A beautiful, simple app.
neu.Notes+. This isn’t quite what I need, because it has pens instead of brushes. But the traces are editable vector art, exportable to real desktop drawing apps.
Moleskine. Feature rich, but it looks and acts like it was developed on Android. Oops, but it integrates with Evernote.
The screen on this device is astonishing. I will never buy anything not retina. It has forced me to re-evaluate my approach to screen fonts, about which I will write later. I have a smart cover and find it amusing but useless. I pack it in a Roocase which pleases me. The small lightning connector makes my iPhone seem like a relic. I wish the iPad was even lighter than its remarkable current state. I can’t fathom using a smaller screen, because after all I have the iPhone.